| Home |
| Contact Me |
| My Articles |
| My Blogs |
| My Workshops |
| News |
| Search |
| Tag Cloud |
| AYE Conference |
| Colleagues |
| My Blogroll |
| Gradient of Agreement |
|
|
| Tuesday, 15 May 2007 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm a big fan of Sam Kaner's Guide to Participatory Decision-Making, ISBN 0-86571-347-2. I highly recommend it to anyone who leads meetings. In my post on Decide as a Team, I wrote about using a method called Roman Evaluation to reach a decision. Kaner talks about a more formal concept he calls Gradient of Agreement in his book. I am less enthusiastic about the Gradient of Agreement today than when I was first introduced to it. Why? The following table compares Roman Evaluation versus Gradient of Agreement:
Although I know the Gradient of Agreement will work, especially with large groups, it seems overly complex to me compared to Roman Evaluation. And Gradient of Agreement has levels (blue font) that seem ambiguous to me. I question whether a participant could support the decision; for instance, it's hard for me to support a proposal which I don't have an opinion; or I don't like; or I disagree with; or I don't want any implementation involvement. I suspect a participant that voted that way would provide, at best, lukewarm support. I prefer the simplicity and clear meaning that comes from using Roman Evaluation. ©2007 Steven M Smith
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (1)
![]()
good point
written by Sports Artist , March 27, 2008 I agree Its hard to support a proposal or an idea that you don't like or agree with. It doesn't feel comfortable backing something you don't believe in. As my old coach you to say "Give 100% or don't give anything at all". Write comment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Next > |
|---|